Suhrid singh v. randhir singh
WebShare with Email, opens mail client. Email WebThe trial Court, while relying upon the judgment passed in Suhrid Singh v. Randhir Singh and Others 2010 AIR (SC) 2807, has held that once the plaintiff is the executant of a document and prays for its annulment, he is required to deposit the ad valorem court fee on the …
Suhrid singh v. randhir singh
Did you know?
Web18 May 2016 · The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Suhrid Singh (supra) after considering various aspects as to in what cases a declaration is required and in what cases cancellation is required held that difference between a prayer for cancellation and … Web9 Oct 2024 · Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs Randhir Singh and Others- 29/03/2010 Cancellation of the deed: If ‘A’, the executant of the deed, seeks cancellation of the deed, he has to pay ad-valorem court fee on the consideration stated in the sale deed.
WebIt is further submitted that the court below has relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs. Randhir Singh and others reported in (2010) 12 SCC 112 wherein it has been held that for declaration of an instrument to be null and void only ad valorem court fee is payable. WebMonika Rahar (She/Her)’s Post Monika Rahar (She/Her) Associate, Test Prep at LawSikho 1y
Web5 Sep 2024 · (iii) for a declaration that the sale deeds dated 20.4.2001, 24.4.2001 and 6.7.2001 executed by his father S. Rajinder Singh in favour of the first defendant and sale deed dated 27.9.2003 executed by the alleged power of attorney holder of S.Rajender Singh in favour of second defendant, in regard to certain agricultural lands (described in the … Web29 Mar 2010 · (iii) for a declaration that the sale deeds dated 20.4.2001, 24.4.2001 and 6.7.2001 executed by his father S. Rajinder Singh in favour of the first defendant and sale deed dated 27.9.2003 executed by the alleged power of attorney holder of S.Rajender …
Web9 Nov 2010 · The learned Counsel for respondent No. 1, on the other hand, cited the decision of the Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh Vs. Randhir Singh, 2010 AIR SCW 3308, and argued that the order passed by the Trial Court is legal and proper. 5. We have perused the plaint …
Web29 Mar 2010 · (i) for a declaration that two houses and certain agricultural lands purchased by his father S. Rajinder Singh were co-parcenary properties as they were purchased from the sale proceeds of ancestral properties, and that … fried curry cauliflowerWebThe defendants filed an application seeking directions to the plaintiff to affix the ad valorem Court fee which has been dismissed by the lower Court relying upon ‘Suhrid Singh alias Sardool Singh versus Randhir Singh and others, [2010(2) Law Herald (SC) 1371 : 2010(2) Law Herald (P&H) 1356 (SC)] : 2010(2) CCC 510 (SC)’. faulbach bauhofWeb7 Sep 2024 · Lastly the SC referred to the judgment in the case of Suhrid Singh Vs. Randhir Singh 14, wherein it was held that where an executant to a deed wants it 13 Section 4:- Specific relief can be granted only for the purpose of enforcing individual civil rights and not for the mere purpose of enforcing a penal law. 14 (2010) 12 SCC 112 to be annulled ... fried custard puddingWeb29 Mar 2010 · Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh … Appellant Vs. Randhir Singh & Ors. … Respondents J U D G M E N T R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J. Leave granted. The appellant filed a suit (Case No.381/2007) on the file of the Civil . Judge, Senior Division, Chandigarh for several reliefs. The plaint contains . several elaborate prayers, summarizes below : fried cushaw squash recipesWebMonika Rahar (She/Her)’s Post Monika Rahar (She/Her) Associate, Test Prep at LawSikho 11mo Edited fau last day of classes spring 2023Web17 May 2024 · Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs. Randhir Singh and others, reported in 2010 (2) R.C.R. (Civil) 564, plaintiff is not ...direction to the learned Trial Court to decide the question of payment of court fee once again in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the matter of Suhrid Singh (supra). faulconer energy owner relationsWeb29 Mar 2010 · Case: Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh Vs Randhir Singh and Others. Supreme Court (India) Judgment Cited in 32 Precedent Map Related. Vincent. Case Number: Civil Appeal Nos. 2811-2813 of 2010 (Arising out of SLP[C] Nos. 6745-47/2009) Counsel: For Appellant: Party-in-Person and For Respondents: Labh Singh Bhangu and Madhu … fried cumin powder